Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

You can't Lead Where you won't Go

Congratulations! You have just been promoted to manager in your organization, and even better, you are now the leader of everyone that you use to work with in your company. Wow! What a challenge!

But, how do you go from being peer-partner to partner-leader? Much of how this transition will play out will be driven by the kind of leader that you were BEFORE you were promoted. No matter where you are in an organization, you are in fact a leader. You may be the Consensus Builder, or you may be the Keeper of the Trust of the team. You may be the Quiet Leader that everyone feels comfortable around. You may be the Status Quo Breaker or the Question all the Logic kind of leader. You may be the “Why do we it that way?” kind of leader. At the end of the day, all are important to a team, but only one person can be the true out front, buck stops here leader when a promotion opportunity comes around. Company management does have a choice to go outside and avoid all of the political infighting that may come from promoting from within, but often you will see a true promotion up from the ranks as a highly motivating experience. In military terms, this “Field Grade Promotion” comes with recognition of leadership and character in adverse situations. Or it may mean that someone got a great offer, and just moved on, leaving a vacuum of leadership. Either way, what a great opportunity for the right person, so let’s take a moment to reflect on what it takes to navigate this challenging transition.

Keeping your team productive and hopeful during a new boss transition can be complex. Forging a workplace partnership is key to developing a loyal and engaged group. No pressure here, but trust in leadership is critical. According to a Gallup survey, people don’t just quit companies or leave because of compensation, they quit people. Getting on the employees bad side may be as simple as not asking for their opinions, not offering good feedback, or putting someone in a role that they are just not prepared to do and for which they are ill suited. People want fact-based praise and recognition for their work. And by the way, NOT scolding is not the same as offering lots of praise.

How do you keep employees from slowly disengaging and turning off? How do you keep them from becoming disillusioned and resigning inwardly? This does not happen immediately, but over the course of time during the routine work week. It is clearly important to keep motivation high.
The motivation level of employees has tangible economic ramifications for the company. In the group of engaged employees, there are lower rates of theft, fewer defective products, fewer work accidents, less employee turnover and lower levels of absenteeism. And those are only the direct costs. Motivated employees also work more productively, are more innovative and more responsive to customers. All these factors serve to increase the company's profitability. Highly engaged and motivated employees are also the ones with an elevated sense of emotional connection to their jobs. They feel valued and empowered.
Make no mistake, people like to work. According to a Gallup survey in Germany began in 2001, people were asked the following question, “If you were to inherit enough money to no longer need to work, would you continue with your job or would you quit?" As many as seven out of ten employees in Germany would not resign despite an inheritance that would provide them a financially carefree life. This indicates the fundamentally positive relationship between people and their work. Even two-thirds of those about to retire would continue working despite a large inheritance.
As you assume greater management responsibility, realize that these skills may not be that teachable. Just like social skills, and how we present our self as leaders, much is learned at the feet of our parents. Like it or not, we are taught how to treat others, and those early lessons may be a wonderful source to pull experience and insight. For others, they may be not so great to pull from in the work place. This is a primary driver behind the “Peter Principle” where a person is likely to be promoted to their highest level of inefficiency. In this respect, the best sales person can also be the worst manager. Selling skills and management skills are two distinct skills indeed.
Bottom-line, congratulations on your new responsibility. Keep your head up and your ethics higher. Seek out a mentor, and train yourself on the skills of leading others. Surround your self with a diverse and experienced team, praise them often, and get out of their way. Some of best leaders, both past and present, were only as good as the team that they were surrounded by in their office.

Friday, April 9, 2010

Leadership for the Rest of Us

I again had the opportunity to hear US Senator Jeff Sessions discuss current affairs and take questions at an event held at Samford University this past week. As before, his insight and clarity of thought have made me seek out additional information as to the drivers behind our economy and what it can mean for small business. As Senator Sessions opined, “We need and welcome healthy, lively debate. What we do not need now is apathy.” He is so right, and as this writer has offered the challenge here on more than one occasion to please take ownership of where you collect your information. Please seek your information out in multiple sources, and preferably in person.

Gathering information in person is invaluable to understanding what someone truly means as you observe their body language with your own eyes, and listen with your own ears. Seeking out your own information to draw your own conclusions can be just the apple to keep the spin doctor away. For example, when it was suggested to Senator Sessions that we are in the middle of a healthcare debate with extreme opinions getting all the attention, and that perhaps the answer to our fiscal crisis and concerns on health care costs will be found in the middle, this is what happened. Senator Sessions stated, “Well we are at a 900 Billion deficit, now. Would you be pleased if we were at 450 Billion?” The clear point made that even the middle was not something that we can afford. More importantly, the statement was made with a small, but confident smile, sharpened with a small lean forward and to the left. No crossed legs. No pause. No looking up into the air. His message was clear. When is comes to United States debt, there is no middle ground at that level.

This message resonates as very important as the impact of the health care legislation sinks into the collective consciousness of small business owners. A level of dissatisfaction is bubbling to the surface as business owners recheck their balance sheet to see what line item needs to be juggled to pay for any potential financial obligations that the health care legislation will impart. The several companies that are now being called on the carpet to justify their dissatisfaction with a personal meeting in Washington will be watched with great expectation by this writer.

Dissatisfaction is a motivator for change, and this is true for not only changing someone’s behavior, but also changing the targets of change. People are more responsive to learning when they are moderately dissatisfied; too little, and they don’t want to bother; too much is paralyzing. Therefore, if you want to increase a group’s readiness to change, you need to manage their dissatisfaction. In Managing People: the R Factor, Allan Cohen writes that often this requires finding ways to increase dissatisfaction and can be accomplished in several ways which are often very intentional. The R factor examines roles, relationships, rewards, and rites and is the strategic and tactical method of cultivating dissatisfaction as a motivator to organizations. The status quo is a killer, and the art of managing dissatisfaction is key to driving our markets today on both the political and domestic front. Open the papers, read your online news, or listen to the TV or radio, and you can see examples of dissatisfaction everywhere. I see it as the primary driver behind the Tea Party movement and the rising expectation of transparency in business and in government. Organizational stress bubbles up when people no longer feel that they have control over their life at work. Pushing through this and leading through the change needed is critical for not just management and but all leadership. This ongoing challenge for management in business and government should be driven by educating to the growth and change needed, not testing the amount of power held or proving the level of correctness.

The answer may be found quite simply in asking yourself, “What are you measuring?” In Total Quality Management (TQM) lingo, don’t just look at your internal yardstick; look at your external yardstick too. For example, if your sales team only measures itself by improving over its own best performance, you may get passed up really quickly. Take a look at how others in your industry are performing too. This goes for government as well. How do we measure up to other states and even countries? This type of self reflection and line of thoughtful questioning may just help keep you ahead of the pack, and out in front of the herd too.

So remember, take care of your customers, or someone else will.